The organisations involved are the US Department of Energy’s Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) in Washington, the Chinese Academy of Sciences’ Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics (DICP) in Dalian, and China’s Institute of Coal Chemistry.
All three organisations are internationally recognised for research in developing improved technologies for safe and clean production of energy from coal and have mutual interests in:
o High temperature chemistry and diagnostics related to coal gasification.
o Functional sorbents design and development of syngas separations.
o Catalysis for hydrocarbon synthesis and conversions.
The three partner institutions have complementary research programmes without a lot of duplication. Where there are overlaps in currently funded projects, the teams initiate joint projects with each organisation using resources from their individual government funding agencies.
“With demand for energy – both electricity and transportation fuels – increasing, despite efficiency gains, coal usage is going to increase in both countries,” said Mike Davis, associate laboratory director for energy science and technology at PNNL. “Our challenge, on the research side, is to make it happen cleanly and economically. Together, I believe we can make important strides in this effort.”
“This is a unique opportunity to design and test new processes – such as carbon dioxide capture – that will reduce significantly the environmental impacts of coal usage,” said Doug Ray, associate laboratory director for fundamental science at PNNL.
Initially, the consortium is collaborating on air separation, coal gasification, cleanup and separation, and water gas shift reactions in the gas stream, hydrocarbon synthesis and carbon dioxide capture and utilisation.
However, the ICFCE’s first breakthrough has come with gas flaring. According to the Paris-based International Energy Agency, about 400m tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent is released this way every year.
In new work, researchers have identified the structure of a catalytic material that can turn methane into a safe and easy-to-transport liquid. The insight lays the foundation for converting excess methane into a variety of useful fuels and chemicals.
“There’s a big interest in doing something with this ‘stranded’ methane other than flaring it off,” said PNNL chemist Chuck Peden. “An important thing researchers have struggled with is determining the structure of the active catalyst.’
That catalyst – molybdenum oxide sitting on a zeolite mineral – converts methane gas into the more tractable liquid benzene (Fig.1). But the process is not yet commercially viable. Scientists do not understand enough about the molecular details to improve the catalyst. Now, researchers at PNNL and the DICP have worked out some of the details that will help researchers zoom in on an efficient catalyst.
They reported their results 26th March in the Journal of the American Chemical Society. This work is the first publication to come out of the ICFCE.
To get these results, the chemists – led by Peden at PNNL and Xinhe Bao at DICP – used the world’s largest instrument of its kind – a 900-megahertz nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectrometer. The NMR is armed with one of the strongest magnets constructed and can be outfitted to investigate solid samples, a step above its smaller cousins.
The combination of molybdenum oxide and a zeolite mineral had been shown in 1993 to convert methane, but the catalyst has been difficult to analyse. Researchers know that the zeolite anchors molybdenum oxide in place so methane and molybdenum oxide can react chemically, either on or in the zeolite channels. But no one could tell which comprised the reactive form: a small nugget of one or two molecules, or a larger cluster of many molybdenum oxide molecules.
“This uncertainty has led to a controversy in the scientific literature about the active phase and reaction mechanism of methane activation on these promising catalyst materials,” said DICP’s Bao.
Enter the world’s largest NMR. The technological problem lay in the molybdenum oxide itself. To study this particular oxide with NMR, the chemists needed to pick up the signal from one variant of molybdenum, 95Mo; the ultra-high field of the NMR, housed at the DOE’s environmental molecular sciences laboratory on the PNNL campus, allowed them to do so.
“The higher magnetic field improves the signal to noise,” said Peden. “And its large sample volume allowed us to put enough catalyst into the spectrometer to overcome the poor sensitivity of 95MoNMR.”
The researchers painstakingly prepared catalysts with increasing concentrations of molybdenum in the zeolite scaffold and focused the 900MHzNMR on the samples. The data revealed two different forms of the catalyst, as expected. One form contained the smaller nugget and the other form comprised the much larger clusters. When the concentration of molybdenum rose, more of these large clusters formed.
Then the team added methane and measured how much got converted into benzene by the catalysts. They found that when more smaller nuggets were present, more benzene was made, indicating the variety of one or two molybdenum oxide molecules was the reactive one.
Now, said Peden, the challenge is to design and produce the active form of the catalyst that could be used for large-scale benzene production, research that Bao and his group are already working on.
“We need to figure out how to get that structure and keep it that way,” concluded Bao.
