subscribe
 

Automated pre-placement solder paste inspection

16th June 2015


Before and after Optimisation Before and after Optimisation
After optimisation and normalisation After optimisation and normalisation

Automated pre-placement solder paste inspection (SPI) has established itself in SMT assembly as an essential tool for optimising the process and reducing end of line defects.

It’s been commonly accepted for many years that a majority of assembly defects can be traced back to print defects, and by using raw measurement data from printed PCBs for volume, area, height and offset, SPC histograms and control charts can quite readily be used to optimise the process.

Following optimisation, SPI is used to detect print anomalies. However, the multitude of ‘normal’ variables introduced from board characteristics, clamping methodologies, stencil variations and paste type force unacceptably wide tolerance settings. These board-wide good/bad tolerances can easily mount to ±50% or more. For most, this is unacceptable, because of course, with such wide tolerances production drift can be missed and important defects ignored.

Aperture release

For example, stencil pattern variations cause differences between designed (expected) and actual solder release. For large apertures, release variation is generally negligible. Small apertures can account for up to 50% release variation or even more. Stencil thickness to aperture area ratio determines how close to 100% release efficiency is achievable.

As pads get smaller and smaller, the area of the aperture wall approaches that of the pad area. In turn, the paste release efficiency is reduced as the adhesion forces from the walls approach that of the pad. Thus, different pad sizes across a board will exhibit different volume performance.

A common work-around for this is possible by selecting specific areas and setting tolerances for these apertures.

Though these custom tolerance settings may be individually easy to perform, they are time consuming and do not carry over to other PCB’s due to differences in design, manufacture and finish. These differences are common practice in just in time manufacturing:

1. Solder mask thickness variations; typical thickness 25 um  +25/–12um; Silk screen legends can add 12 um

2. Solder mask defined or non solder mask defined apertures

3. Gasketing effect variations

4. Solder pad finish. a. OSP and gold 0 %variation; b. HASL ±20um

5. Board Warpance.

These all create variations on the ‘zero reference height’ point on each pad for measurement

Automated Normalisation has been introduced by Mek SPI which directly addresses the excessive time required for board region based tolerance tightening. This two-stage system allows the user to first optimise the printing process and then once the optimisation has been completed, to automatically normalise the results and then set tighter tolerances to monitor product drift, enabling meaningful production control. The 5D measurement, combining 2D and 3D measurements ensures proper zero referencing, forming a solid base for accurate and repeatable measurements.

The normalisation extraction takes user selected average area, height and volume from several previous inspections when being set. Thus, an accurate representation of the capability of the print process is incorporated. If a process change, such as stencil or print settings need be made, the normalisation extraction can be readily reset and then applied once again.







Subscribe

Subscribe



https://www.rotork.com/?utm_source=engineer%20live&utm_medium=banner%20ad&utm_campaign=Engineer%20Live

Newsbrief

twitter facebook linkedin © Setform Limited